Last edited by Juk
Tuesday, August 4, 2020 | History

3 edition of The U.S. sea-based strategic force found in the catalog.

The U.S. sea-based strategic force

United States. Congressional Budget Office.

The U.S. sea-based strategic force

costs of the Trident submarine and missile programs and alternatives

by United States. Congressional Budget Office.

  • 318 Want to read
  • 3 Currently reading

Published by The Office : for sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off. in Washington .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • United States. -- Navy -- Weapons systems,
  • Trident (Weapons systems),
  • Fleet ballistic missile weapons systems

  • Edition Notes

    StatementThe Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office ; [prepared by Richard H. Davison, Beth S. Bloomfield, and Harold W. Furchtgott]
    SeriesBackground paper - Congressional Budget Office, Background paper (United States. Congressional Budget Office)
    ContributionsDavison, Richard H, Bloomfield, Beth, Furchtgott-Roth, Harold W
    The Physical Object
    Paginationxx, 62 p. :
    Number of Pages62
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL17984101M

    strategic warning time will be available to the Allies. In that case, however, peacetime deployments need not be altered. The costs associated with air defense in the G-I-UK gap would also account for maintaining the present level both of U.S. peacetime presence in Asia, and U.S. naval warfighting capabilities in the event of a non-NATO conflict. The U.S. Air Force has embarked on a new round of strategic planning, under the auspices of its Strategic Master Plan (SMP), to help set the future direction of the service. Refining the Air Force's strategic planning process may help the service align itself to its environment and keep key initiatives on : Michael J. Mazarr, Jeffrey Eggers, Diana Gehlhaus Carew, Raphael S. Cohen, Caitlin Lee, Rebeca Orrie.

      Preparing for the Future: Strategic Planning in the U.S. Air Force - Ebook written by Michael Barzelay, Colin Campbell. Read this book using Google Play Books app on your PC, android, iOS devices. Download for offline reading, highlight, bookmark or take notes while you read Preparing for the Future: Strategic Planning in the U.S. Air Force. Get this from a library! Flying blind: the politics of the U.S. strategic bomber program. [Michael E Brown] -- Flying Blind offers an astute analysis of the role of organizational forces in initiating and shaping weapons programs. Michael E. Brown concerns himself with how weapons programs begin and why they.

      A new strategy for the surface force – released on Monday – creates an outline for a navy that anticipates a return to high-end warfare it hasn’t known since the Cold War. Former Chief of Staff of the U.S. Air Force (CSAF) Gen Michael Dugan worried, “We’re a service of technology as opposed to strategy.”1 Dugan’s fears echo several other senior leaders’ frustration with Air Force strategic planning. Despite a rich intellectual tradition, the Air Force.


Share this book
You might also like
Final report on the classification of geographical books and maps

Final report on the classification of geographical books and maps

Poetry

Poetry

Land claims in Missouri. (To accompany bill H.R. no. 1204.).

Land claims in Missouri. (To accompany bill H.R. no. 1204.).

The catechism of the church

The catechism of the church

practice of medicine with especial reference to the use of active principles and other definite methods

practice of medicine with especial reference to the use of active principles and other definite methods

Rebecca

Rebecca

Executive reorganization

Executive reorganization

When milk and cookies arent enough

When milk and cookies arent enough

How to raise and train a Rhodesian ridgeback

How to raise and train a Rhodesian ridgeback

Diminuendo

Diminuendo

Information Processing

Information Processing

Regional analysis and economic geography

Regional analysis and economic geography

John Petts

John Petts

Progress in chromatography

Progress in chromatography

Hand-made pointers and borders.

Hand-made pointers and borders.

30 centuries of Iranian art

30 centuries of Iranian art

The U.S. sea-based strategic force by United States. Congressional Budget Office. Download PDF EPUB FB2

Background Paper: The U.S. Sea--Based Strategic Force: Costs of the Trident Submarine and Missile Programs and Alternatives. THE U.S. SEA-BASED STRATEGIC FORCE: COSTS OF THE TRIDENT SUBMARINE AND MISSILE PROGRAM ANS D ALTERNATIVES The Congress of the United States Congressional pudget Office For sale by the Superintenden of Documentst U.S.

Government Printin Officg e Washington. D.C 2. The U.S. Sea-Based Strategic Force: Costs of the Trident Submarine and Missile Programs and Alternatives. The U.S. sea-based strategic force: costs of the Trident submarine and missile programs and alternatives. The U.S. Maritime Strategy Hardcover – July 1, (the strength of their submarine force) and raising some interesting issues (using nuclear weapons at sea may be akin to the firing platform committing suicide.) It's an interesting point, that I think the Navy department took to heart at the time, because the Navy seemed to get rid of a 4/5(1).

Strategic planning is, above all, a journey that can at times be both dynamic and difficult. The authors have cogently described the U.S.

Air Force's experience in planning for the 21st century —it is a valuable addition to the literature on this subject.".Cited by: Since the first submarine strategic deterrent patrol by USS George Washington (SSBN) inU.S. nuclear ballistic missile submarines (or SSBNs) have provided the most survivable leg of the U.S.

Strategic Nuclear Triad. U.S. SSBNs on patrol are virtually undetectable and hold adversary strategic targets constantly at risk.

Today’s force of 14 Ohio-class SSBNs carry 70. U.S. Strategic Nuclear Policy and Force Structure: Three Analytical Approaches [Russell H. Wagner] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

This is a NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA report procured by the Pentagon and made available for public release. It has been reproduced in the best form available to the Pentagon.

Author: Russell H. Wagner. sea-based retaliatory capability were determined, deploying the Trident II missile could result in lowest total program costs. At double today's capability level (that is, to keep 4, warheads at sea), a submarine force armed with Trident II missiles might be roughly 6 to 7 percent less expensive than a Trident I-equipped.

The 12 planned Columbia-class submarines will provide an overdue modernization of the U.S. sea-based strategic deterrent force and will possess advanced stealth technologies to ensure they remain.

Strategic Planning and the U.S. Air Force: Characteristics of Success by Michael J. Mazarr (Author), Jeffrey Eggers (Author), Diana Gehlhaus Carew (Author), & ISBN ISBN Why is ISBN important.

Author: Michael J. Mazarr, Jeffrey Eggers, Diana Gehlhaus Carew, Raphael S. Cohen, Caitlin Lee, Rebeca Orrie. Start studying ORGANIZATION AND GUIDANCE. SEA POWER Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.

U.S. Fleet Forces Command. This element of Sea Power 21 provides the nation with sea-based theater and strategic defense. Strategic nuclear modernization critics have questioned the need to modernize the U.S.

SSBN force and argued that a smaller number of Columbia-class SSBNs can provide a sufficient deterrent. In the military finds three black drill sergeants to scapegoat. They were sent to prison and this left the commanding generals and colonels untouched to retire quietly.

The Army appointed a panel to investigate sexual harassment. One of the panelists was the sergeant Major of the Army, Eugene McKinney. Building a Strategic Air Force [Office of Air Force History, U.S.

Air Force] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Building a Strategic Air Force/5(3). have been removed. Nevertheless, the book remains unchanged in intent and purpose.

Although this is not primarily a textbook, it does reflect both the method and manner we use to teach strat-egy formulation to America’s future senior leaders. The book is not a comprehensive or exhaustive treatment of either strategic theory or the poli.

U.S. force planning should hedge by providing general capabilities and organizational agility that allow both strategic and operational adaptations to unanticipated developments. 64 We should seek to invest to ensure that the joint force is as dominant on the ground as our sea and air Services currently are in their respective domains.

U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues. Congressional Research Service had to eliminate these missiles while implementing the treaty. Therefore, the Pentagon began planning for their elimination, and the Air Force added funds to its budget for this purpose in United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) is one of the eleven unified combatant commands in the United States Department of artered at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, USSTRATCOM is responsible for strategic deterrence, global strike, and operating the Defense Department's Global Information also provides a host of capabilities to support Country: United States of America.

A quarter-century of global maritime dominance by the U.S. Navy is now being tested by the return of great power dynamics.

The security interests of the United States and those of our allies are increasingly challenged by near-peer competitors, confrontational foreign governments, and well-armed non-state militant groups.

The U.S. Air Force Remotely Piloted Aircraft and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Strategic Vision (hereafter referred to as The Strategic Vision) examines the future role of Air Force remotelyFile Size: KB.future intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) force with “the objec-tive of defining a cost-effective approach that supports continued reduc - tions in U.S.

nuclear weapons, while promoting stable deterrence.” In support of this work, the Air Force Assistant Chief of Staff for Strategic.With the U.S.

Air Force facing pressure to reduce its headquarters staff, many question the utility of strategic planning and the need to produce public strategy documents. A look at past efforts finds that strategic planning is still needed, but perhaps not in its current form.